Nathan Calvin

OpenAI is pursuing legal action and subpoenas against AI governance nonprofits, alleging they are funded by billionaire competitors like Elon Musk and Dustin Moskovitz to obstruct the company's progress.

“General counsel of AI governance nonprofit Encode who was subpoenaed by OpenAI and discusses his experience being served legal papers.”

“Criticized Anthropic's policy decisions and safety commitments, particularly regarding recursive self-improvement and governance.”

“Supported California's SB 53 AI law according to Sacks; member of advocacy group that allegedly helped spread Coxon's post.”

“User with nuanced take that it's fine to think AGI is here if clear that models will get much better.”

“Advocacy group leader agreeing with Pachocki on AI risks but criticizing OpenAI for lack of transparency.”

“Tweeted about reporting showing OpenAI downplaying rather than hyping AI incidents.”

“Criticized lack of New York Times and Wall Street Journal coverage of METR report revelations about OpenAI/Hugging Face incident.”

OpenAI allegedly subpoenaed AI regulation advocates and their personal communications, claiming they are investigating Elon Musk's involvement while critics argue it is intimidation of AI safety advocates.

“Claims OpenAI sent police to serve him a subpoena requesting private messages with California legislators and others as part of OpenAI's lawsuit against Elon Musk.”